In mid-2004, there was a
curiosity sparked inside of me when I first laid eyes on the Mario Bava film, Shock. I won’t go into the details about
that film since more than likely I will be reviewing it within the next few
weeks but it began my venture into the foray of Italian murder-mysteries and
the genre of said films known across the world as giallo. Though the only Italian horror film I’d seen up to that
time had been Suspiria, but my recent
viewings at that time of Bay of Blood and
there aforementioned Shock had really
tickled my fancy. Since then, I’ve not only sat through a countless number of
them but have been able to snag a whole bunch of them and add them to my
collection. There is something about this style of film that not only
captivated my attention with their brazen outrageousness but also got me
hooked. I can’t tell you how many hours I’ve spent in front of the computer
researching, doing my homework and trying to see how many of these films I can
watch and soon I was getting my hands on
so many of them that I couldn’t keep up. Before I knew it I was looking at a
plethora of films by Argento, Fulci, Bava (both of them), Martino, Deodato, Lenzi
and my fondness for these kinds of Euro-trash quickly became my second favorite
style of film – next to the slasher film, of course.
This entry, though, was one of
those films that spent months on the shelf in my office before I decided to
finally pick it up and give it a watch yesterday. For starters, let me say that
I will watch any film with the always-wonderful John Saxon at least once. For
years, I’ve been a huge fan of his and have almost every horror flick he’s been
in. Those rugged looks, those piercing eyes – he’s got to be one of the most
dashing and handsome men on the B-movie circuit. So you know that when I read his name in the
cast listing it was immediately placed into my Netfilx queue at the top of the
list. Then when I read it had been directed by Sergio Martino – whose Your Vice is a Locked Room and Only I Have
the Key had already spent months dormant in my collection, as well – I knew
that I was going to have a good time. Several weeks before sitting down to
watch this, though, I’d gone online and read other people’s opinions about this
one and was surprised – and a little saddened - at just how many bad reviews it
had gotten. I was thoroughly disappointed to read that a film with a catchy
title as The Scorpion with Two Tails (as
opposed to its alternate title Murder in
an Etruscan Cemetery) could be at all bad. But, I proceeded with caution. I
mean, let’s face it, we’ve all seen worse. (Hellgate,
anyone?)
The film opens up with a bizarre
sequence with a woman named Joan (the gorgeous Elivire Audray) having
nightmares about a ritual in an underground grotto with a young couple having
their necks broken and then being sacrificed. Her husband (John Saxon) is on
the other side of the world on an archaeological excursion who seems to have
discovered an ancient Etruscan tomb when while away, is murdered by an unknown
assailant in the same manner she’s seen in her dreams. She goes to Italy to try
and find out just what happened and why she knew exactly what her husband had
stumbled upon if she’d never been to Italy. Accompanied by her friend and
confidant Mike (Paolo Malco, known for The
New York Ripper and House by the
Cemetery), Joan tries to put all the puzzle pieces together beginning with
why everything she was encountering in real life had already been seen in
dreams while dealing with a drug deal gone wrong that she never would have expected
involving both her deceased husband, countess Maria (played by the
fantastically gorgeous Marilu Tolo) and her father.
While in Italy, Joan finds out
that her husband had found an important artifact while in the grotto that was
meant for her: A necklace of a scorpion with two tails that was being kept in
the care of a local jeweler. Why does this look familiar to her? It seems that
while down in the tomb her husband had discovered he came across it, and along
with other archaeologists, she realizes that the photo of a subject found on
the walls looks exactly like her. And she’s wearing a necklace with a scorpion
with two tails that looks exactly like the one her husband had found and left
to her. Why does she look like the woman painted on the wall? Who is she and
could she be connected to all the dreams she’s been having? And why does a lot
of the music in this film sound familiar? Maybe I’ve heard it in The Beyond? Or was it The Gates of Hell?
What ensues is not so much a giallo as I was expecting it to be but
more a thriller. I do have to warn you though that the story’s pacing is quite
slow and some of the plot devices are not only outlandish and absurd but render
some portions of the film completely incomprehensible (including a revelation
at the film’s close that never would have worked in the real life and makes you
burst out in obnoxious laughter). There are countless scenes involving statues
and maggots galore and plenty of moments with Joan screaming for – what appears
to be - pure show. With that said, it still managed to keep my attention
somehow.
The photography, on the other
hand, was excellent. The Italian countryside is bursting with rich colors and
wonderful greens and yellows. One reason I love these foreign films is that the
cinematographers always photograph their surroundings with precision and care.
There’s nothing I love more than to watch these movies and get a glimpse of
what life was like during those time periods. I get to see buildings and cities
and country sides and beaches all caught with precision and beauty and
preserved for me to see anytime I want to.
Mya Communications did a great
job with this disc, visually. I don’t own many of their titles but what I do
have in my collection is great. This disc, though, is probably the best one I
have. The opening DVD menus are absolutely gorgeous and crisp and I liked how
there was a soft fadeout after every selection. There isn’t much as far as
bonus features are concerned, though, just the trailer, poster gallery, and
alternate opening sequence with the alternate title (looking like someone did
the titles with an old Tandy computer) but I did like the juxtaposition of the
bloody hands on the menu screen against soft Italio-Muzak. There’s something about
that combination – and it’s a combination used in many Italian thrillers – that
I really dig. I’m not going to say to hunt this one down because I’d be leading
you on. I think it’s worth a look if you like these kinds of films. It’s not as
bad as many reviews I’ve read claim it to be, but I have to be honest and say
that it isn’t stellar. I’ve only seen three or four of Martino’s works and I
can tell you that this is the weakest one so far. But, just because it’s weak
doesn’t mean it doesn’t deserve at least one watch. One of my rules as a horror
watcher – and reviewer – that I live by is that you can’t bank a film solely on
what someone else says about it. There are so many palettes and tastes that lie
within horror fandom that relying on just one person’s opinion would be unfair not
only to the film itself, but to yourself as the viewer. How do you know if you
will like a film if you don’t sit in front of it? One of the risks you take
being an avid horror fan is that some films are going to rock your world and other’s
will not. I always say that for every fantastic horror film you watch, there
will be three or four that you’ll see that will genuinely suck. That’s just the
way it is. And I’m talking about the film sucking in a bad way, where there is
nothing in it that will redeem itself. (Hellgate,
anyone?)
The film’s closing act is so
absurd that you have to force yourself to believe it, and I mean absurd to the
point of hysterical laughter. As I said earlier, it would never work in the
real world and suspension of disbelief gives you no choice but to smile and nod
your head, albeit unkindly. You have to give the writers and producers credit
for their attempted creativity because the combinations of plot points and
storyline don’t spell “blockbuster” in any way shape or form. But then again
what film such as this one would? Yes, it was missing creativity in the aspect
of murder sequences – everyone pretty much dies in the same manner – but it
still wasn’t enough for me to turn off the DVD player. The red herrings here weren’t
crimson enough to confuse or deter and when the killer finally reveals himself,
you’re really inclined to scream out a half-assed “huh?!” than an enthusiastic “what?!”
because the shock that it tries to set itself up for fails to deliver - hard. The
denouement leaves a lot to be desired and the outcome leaves you asking how it
could have been possible to end that way if there wasn’t enough development
between the two characters in question for those results to have materialized? Seriously,
it’s pretty far-fetched but (in my best Italian voice) Whaduya gonna do?.
I’m not going to lie when I say I
won’t see this one again because I probably will – hello, John Saxon’s in it.
The locales and the absurdity of some of the plot points and other goings on
are reason to claim it as bona fide entertainment. This one of those kinds of
films you’d put on after a Friday night after work to end the long work week
when all your plans to go out have fallen through, you’re too tired and lazy to
make dinner and order in a pizza and there’s nothing else left to watch on
television.
1 comment:
One of my least fav films from Sergio Martino.
Have you seen "All the Colors of the Dark"?
Post a Comment