I wish that I had the kind of
memories of my first encounter with this film as I do the others that are on
this blog. Usually I break into an immediate fondness and start recalling the
many who-and-whatzits of where I was in life when I first held the video box to
most of these titles because I like to share the manners in which I got to know
some of these bad boys and girls. Now
that I think back on all those mom-and-pop shops (and the not-so-mom-and-pops) I
walked through during my teenage years, I don’t ever remember seeing this on
any shelf – believe me, I’d remember that fantastic poster art! (I loved it so
much it’s the banner of this blog!) Hmmm, why didn’t I ever see this one if I
can recall boxes for Superstition and
The Seven Doors of Death? I didn’t get into Italian sleaze cinema
until the mid-to-late nineties, after I’d both discovered and then ridden the Suspiria train a few hundred-or-so
times. By the time I did enough reading on this to go actually out and look for
it, it was readily available on DVD so I apologize for not getting that
warm-and-toasty feeling when I talk about The
New York Ripper – though I honestly wish I could.
I started taking time to research
titles and directors and slowly started to become more and more interested in
films coming from that other end of the world. I wasn’t even aware at that time
that horror films came out of any other country but the U.S. – as ridiculous as
that sounds - and little did I know that a great deal of these films I was
discovering would top most of the stuff I’d seen that was being home-brewed
here. I came across this entry about two years after I’d already seen Lucio
Fulci’s The Beyond and after reading
about this particular one - and other films of his - on countless message
boards over the internet and learning about its infamous reputation overseas, I
couldn’t resist in tracking/picking up a copy of Blue Underground’s release at
the local Rapsutin’s for under ten bucks just to see what the big deal was
about. I won’t go into how it was one of the original (and more infamous) “Video
Nasties” in Britain, how copies of it were famously escorted out of the
country, and how it was banned outfight for many years, because if you’re a die-hard
as I am, you already know everything there is to know about Lo Squartatore de New York. I already knew who was in it before even
sitting down to watch it: Andrea Occhipinti (A Blade In the Dark), Zora Kerova (who was in Cannibal Ferox) so with the experience I’ve had with horror films, I
pretty much thought I had figured out how this was going to play out. If you’ve
seen this (which you have – why else would you be reading this?), you know that
I was completely wrong.
I won’t give away the details of
the plot because somehow I have this pre-conceived notion that you’ve either already
seen it or know enough about it to be interested in this post. And this is one
of those films that I wouldn’t even think of giving away scene-by-scene because
I want you, the reader, to be able to watch a film as this and form your own
opinion (If you’ve read my review for
“The Hazing” – you’ll note that I gave away the entire film, which actually
caused someone who hadn’t seen it yet to send me a very nasty email). I do
have to admit that I get such a laugh out of the film’s opening sequence and
how it flawlessly breaks into a “CHiPS” kind of theme, musically. Many
Italian-produced horror films (and their respective trailers) begin with (or
shamelessly contain) this kind of cheesy disco-tinged track (Can you say, “Cannibal Ferox”, “The House
on the Edge of the Park”?)
After a bizarre scene of a dog
finding a random severed hand in a bush, we get introduced to the film’s
premise: Someone in a [lousy] Donald Duck voice is killing people across New
York City and the police force – complete with a closeted homosexual college psychoanalyst and a chief
with a penchant for prostitutes - tries their best to solve the mystery. What
ensues is nothing but trash and sleaze and still, after multiple viewings – as
I’m doing now for purposes of this essay – manages to make me both cringe and howl
in laughter, sometimes simultaneously. One of the film’s overall highlights,
for me, is the photographing of the wonderfulness that is/was the old 42nd
Street, lovingly portrayed in gorgeous colors before the camera takes us to a
live sex show and the extremely brutal murder of its actress by a broken bottle
right-bloody-smack in the vajay-jay. I don’t think I’ve seen a murder executed
anywhere else in horror history in that same manner. There is a cold darkness and
feeling of hopelessness to the film that has to be experienced to be believed.
This is no happy movie and that’s something I must stress. There is nothing
redeemable about sitting through this piece of horror history. I sometimes try
to figure out if the intention from the beginning was to prove a point by
purposely making the film in an over-the-top fashion or if it just ended up that
way once things were edited and put together. There are images so darky
constructed that it does give a feeling of impending doom and for brief
moments, we are watching a genuine horror film whose sole motive is to offend –
and that it does. Then, just as one begins to get comfortable (or not so,
depending on your taste), scenes such as the infamous “toe job” scene in the
tavern interrupt and become perfect halfway-points between titillating and
outright revolting but yet still manage to make me burst out loud in hysterics
crying out, “What the f@#* was that?!”.
Conversely, there are moments
such as the scene in the theater (the dream sequence) that are absolutely
gorgeous. The poor girl alone having being chased by someone who just brutally attacked
her and there is a deep helplessness in her eyes, as she looks around to see if
he, the assaulter, can see her. Then, in a blinding light, she sees a familiar
face and it suddenly slashes her with a razor point-blank. She screams over and
over again until she wakes up only to find the familiar face [her boyfriend,
Andrea Occhipinti] in the room with her. She slowly tells him her nightmare in
detail, and then reveals to him that he was the one that assaulted her. That one
scene is fantastic and probably my favorite scene in the entire film. Did I
mention that I have a slight crush on Mr. Occhipinti? His chiseled good looks, his brooding eyes,
those amazing lips. Ever since my first viewing of A Blade in the Dark…and for the sake of this blog, I’ll stop
there.
One scene that drives me into
fits of uncontrollable laughter is the scene when one of the detectives (the
homosexual college psychoanalyst) is seen at a corner newsstand looking through porn magazines - gay
porn magazines. I giggle because maybe I, myself, remember that part of the 80’s? It cracks me up how the cashier plays it
off, stuffing an issue of Blueboy into
a copy of the New York Times for him
ever so discreetly. Suddenly, for a few brief moments, I’m a curious teenage
boy again remembering…well, (pause) just remembering. The first time I watched
this scene I admittedly had to rewind it and see it a few times on repeat. As
I’m writing I wonder to myself if Mr. Fulci made this movie in the manner that
he did to make a political statement or maybe, a disguised social commentary? Was
he trying to make a point by being grossly misogynistic? The constant shots of
New York’s seedy underground sex shops and neon lights (along with a theater
marquee displaying a banner for Final
Exam!) pave the way for scenes such as the slashing of the girl bound to
the bed. The killer, as he caresses her body slowly with a razorblade, dancing
along her skin as he laughs running it down her torso, opening her up and
tearing her flesh apart. The slashing of her nipple and eyeball painted vividly
and in such a grotesque and realistic fashion that you can’t help but scream as
you’re watching. On the imdb boards,
someone even claims that this particular scene is cut and that it goes even
further by having the girl get her crotch gruesomely slashed – which would make
sense seeing that once the scene is over, the long shot once the cops are there
shows her nether region mutilated.
The climax of the film is
fantastic, which I won’t give away and though it leaves the film overwhelmingly
ambiguous, it’s still great. It’s one of those downbeat endings that leave you
thinking, although you really don’t want to. It will leave you confused – as it
is pretty far-fetched - and wanting more but yet in its own right it does the
job. The final scene will leave you guessing but I’ll leave it at that.
In actuality, this film isn’t as graphic
as it’s made out to be, but you do have to take into consideration the time in
which it was released. For the 1980’s it was pretty brutal (the first murder in
the car, that broken bottle to the vag, the sliced nipple and slice across the
eyeball). Even by today’s standards some of the murders are pretty intense. The
film does deliver a dank and putrid atmosphere but somehow doesn’t do it enough
to drag you into its gaping jaws the way you’re expecting it to. Some of the
sexuality in the film is more explicit than most were used to then (a toe job
anyone? LOL!) and its tinged with enough sleaze and coarseness to fill a stew
pot and feed a homeless shelter. That last sentence should tell you everything.
I really can’t say that this
would be “essential” viewing, per se, but only because it’s one of the more
notorious works by Mr. Fulci do I even recommend it. Just with its history and
track record in Europe (and I believe, Australia) it’s one to look at, at least
once. Fulci has plenty of hits and misses in his filmography but if you’re even
the slightest bit curious, seek this one out. It’s available to rent via
Netflix in both DVD form and instant streaming. Your jaw will drop and you’ll
gasp out loud a few times without even knowing it. The rest of the time you’ll
be laughing at the utterly ridiculous dialogue and at the ultra-random WTF
moments scattered throughout – three fingered red herrings and all. I would , though,
probably also recommend getting a warm bath (with a good antibacterial soap) ready
just before pressing play on this evil little nasty, because with the filth and
stench you’re going to have to endure, you will want to wash and scrub yourself
down as hard as you can over and over again after you finish this!
2 comments:
Great review... This is one of those movies where you read years' worth of references to it being among the most disturbing things ever committed to celuloid; then when you watch it, your guard is up and you're constantly expecting extreme gore and viscerally revolting perversion. So it ended up feeling a little underwhelming to me - in much the same way Caligula and (to an even greater extent) the Monda Cane movies did - but as a film I would put in my giallo Top 10 (albeit in the bottom half). It's the last time Fulci was really on top of his game, firing on all cylinders, and he takes the opportunity to push certain aspects of his aesthetic to an extreme some might not be able to handle.
It is not uncommon for Fulci to balance brutality with moments of unexpected beauty. He does so even in this film, with a subway sequence I found hauntingly hypnotic, even sort of tranquil considering the fact the girl *might* be getting murdered any second - great use of colored light and echo-y sax on the soundrack there.
Thank you for the comment, Eric! Glad you enjoyed the post! =)
Post a Comment